Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Stephanie Dawn Clark's avatar

This resonated for me.

I once met someone online whose text game was incredible. But when we first met in person the connection I expected to feel wasn’t really there. I gave it another chance and the connection grew — we even ended up engaged — but by the time I realized he didn’t actually have the capacity to meet me, I was already deeply invested.

It made me realize how easily messaging chemistry can mask deeper differences in relational capacity. The interesting part is that there are early signals of capacity — subtle ones — that show up much sooner than we think.

Hilary Silver's avatar

I’m super into this take, especially the part that refuses to pretend the current dating culture is merely “challenging” rather than structurally incoherent. A lot of what women are calling burnout is actually revelatory. After all, when partnership is no longer required for survival, the tolerance for confusion, low effort, and male entitlement drops fast.

Dating isn’t dead because the apps broke it. Dating is dying in its current form because women are no longer willing to audition for love. The old model depended on women needing partnership badly enough to tolerate ambiguity, misalignment, and obnoxious fuckery. That’s the real collapse. Of course, the apps certainly industrialized it.

And yes, meeting in real life, actual effort, and face-to-face conversation all sound like a saner alternative. Because we don't need dating to die... we need the death of desperation.

9 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?